Drafting the Articles of a Private Company
With
 India’s Startup India Action Plan in force, it is expected that in the 
coming years a large number of entrepreneurs would incorporate their 
entities to enter a startup friendly Indian market. Any startup would 
need its very own constitutional documents, i.e. articles of association
 and memorandum of association. While incorporating a company with the 
standard documents available online is more pocket-friendly, drafting 
the constitutional documents to one’s specific need is always more 
effective and ideal. Especially with subsequent amendment to the 
Companies Act, 2013 and the exemptions provided to the private companies
 under the notification dated June 5, 2015,
 every startup has the advantage of drafting its constitutional 
documents accordingly, which allows it to comply with less strict 
provisions. This post discusses the exemptions available to private 
companies or the amended provisions to be kept in mind while a startup 
drafts its articles of association or an existing private company alters
 its existing articles.
Effect of the Exemption Notification
Under the provisions of Section 462 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”),
 the Central Government has the power to declare which provisions of the
 Act shall not be applicable to a certain class/classes of companies, if
 it thinks it is necessary for public interest. The Central Government, 
exercising its power, has published the exemption notification on June 
5, 2015. This notification is applicable only to private companies as 
defined under Section 2(68) of the Act and shall not be applicable to 
deemed public companies. A private company is defined as a company which
 has a minimum paid-up capital and which restricts the right to transfer
 its shares. Such a company shall have at most 200 members. Whereas, a 
subsidiary of a public company is deemed to be a public company for the 
purposes of the Act, even if such company is incorporated as a private 
company. The exemptions available to a private company, which can be 
incorporated in its articles, are discussed below. 
Relaxation in Related Party Transaction:
 If one wishes to incorporate the matter of related party transactions, 
it is necessary to remember the relaxation provided therein for private 
companies. As per the exemption notification, a private company shall 
not be a related party of:
i.               its holding, subsidiary or an associate company; or
ii.              a subsidiary of a holding company to which the private company is also                    subsidiary.
Hence,
 any contract or arrangement of such nature shall not require any 
approval under section 188 of the Act. Moreover, in accordance with the 
provisions of the exemption notification, a member shall not be 
disqualified to vote on the resolution required to be passed to approve 
any arrangement or contract to which such member is a related party. 
Kinds of Share Capital and Voting Rights: Section 43 of the Act lays down that, a company, limited by shares, shall have two kinds of share capital viz.
 equity share capital and preference share capital. Section 47 deals 
with the voting rights attached to the shares. These provisions, read 
with the rules made thereunder, restrict the rights of a company limited
 by shares to issue shares with differential rights and require strict 
compliance with the rules made for this purpose. The exemption 
notification lays down that if the articles or memorandum of association
 so provide(s), the provisions of Sections 43 and 47 shall not be 
applicable to private companies. 
The
 implication of this exemption is that, a private company shall have the
 liberty to decide the kind of share capital it wishes to have or the 
voting rights attached to any class of shares. So, the startup drafting 
its articles, or a company amending its existing articles can now amend 
its articles in a way which would allow them to issue equity shares of a
 new class which may or may not contain any voting rights, while under 
the provisions of Section 47, the equity shareholders always enjoyed the
 right to vote at all resolutions placed before its members. Again, a 
company can even issue preference shares with such mandatory voting 
rights, i.e. the preference shareholders shall have the right to 
vote in resolution placed before the members, even if such resolution 
does not concern those shareholders.
However,
 one must keep in mind that if the memorandum or articles of a company 
do(es) not provide that the provisions of sections 43 and 47 shall not 
be applicable, such private company would continue to be bound by the 
provisions of those two sections. In addition to section 47, section 106
 of the Act also provides for certain restriction on voting rights. The 
exemption notification lays down that the provisions of that section 
shall continue to be applicable on private companies unless the section 
provides otherwise, or unless the articles of the company provide 
otherwise.
ESOP:
 If the articles are to provide for the issuance of shares through any 
employees’ stock option plan as per the provision of section 62(1)(b), 
now they might state that such issuance shall be made through an 
ordinary resolution passed by the members at a general meeting, although
 the company is free to continue to insert more restrictive provisions 
than the ones prescribed under the Act. 
Borrowing Powers:
 While drafting the articles related to the borrowing power of a private
 limited company, one must remember that although the provisions of 
sections 73 shall continue to be applicable to private companies, the 
prohibition on acceptance of deposits from public would not be 
applicable in case a private company accepts from its members any amount
 exceeding 100% of aggregate of the paid-up share capital and free 
reserves. 
Notice of Meeting:
 Section 101 of the Act and Secretarial Standard on General Meetings lay
 down that a company requires to provide at least 21 days’ clear notice 
before commencing a general meeting, annual or otherwise. A meeting can 
also be convened at a shorter notice if at least 95% of the members give
 their consent for the meeting. A company shall also be free to impose 
stricter provisions than the prescribed ones. The exemption notification
 has, however, relaxed these provisions and it lays down that if the 
articles of association of a private limited company otherwise provide, 
the provisions of section 101 shall not be applicable to such company. 
Hence, the company shall be at liberty to decide the provisions 
governing the notice of general meetings. 
Explanatory Statement, Quorum, Chairman, and Proxy:
 Sections 102 to 105 lay down the provisions governing explanatory 
statements, quorum for general meeting, the procedure to elect the 
chairman of a general meeting, and the procedure to provide proxies. 
While the provisions of these sections would continue to govern private 
companies, if however, the articles of a private company provide 
otherwise, such provisions would not be applicable. Hence, a private 
company now has the option to provide for its own regulations with 
respect to notice of general meeting, statement to be annexed to notice,
 quorum for meetings, chairman of meetings and proxies in its articles. 
In addition to the foregoing, each private company would also have the 
power to decide its own regulations regarding voting by show of hands 
and/or demand for poll, as provided under section 107 and section 109 of
 the Act respectively. The relaxation provided under the exemption 
notification is expected to reduce the compliance requirements with 
respect to general meetings of a private limited company, subject to its
 articles.
Appointment & Powers of Directors:
 Although a private limited company has the liberty to provide in its 
articles that any retiring director shall not be eligible to stand for 
directorship, the provisions to that effect provided in the Act would 
not be applicable to such a company. Hence, any such requirement would 
solely be subject to the choice of the company. In addition to the 
foregoing, none of the restrictions applicable to the board of 
directors, under the provisions of Section 180 of the Act, shall be 
applicable to the board of a private company. Any interested director of
 such company can now participate in any meeting where such subject of 
interest is discussed, subject to disclosure of his/her interest. Hence,
 a company drafting its articles may want to keep this in mind.
Appointment of WTD/MD/Manager: As per the provisions of section 196(4), every company shall appoint a whole time director (“WTD”), managing director (“MD”)
 and/or manager with the approval of the board (obtained at a board 
meeting), which shall be approved by the members at the next general 
meeting of the company. Such appointment would also require compliance 
with the provisions of Section 197 and Schedule V of the Act. Any 
variation to the conditions specified under Schedule V would, in 
addition, require the approval of the Central Government. Every company 
usually specifies the manner in which such WTD, MD or manager can be 
appointed, in its articles. The private companies are now exempted from 
this requirement, as the provisions of both sub-section 4 and 5 of 
section 196 shall not be applicable to such companies. Thus, no approval
 is required by a private company at its board meeting or at a 
subsequent general meeting. They do not need to comply with the 
provisions of section 197 of the Act, dealing with managerial 
remuneration or, the conditions laid down under Schedule V. Hence, any 
variation thereto would not require any approval from the Central 
Government either. A private company, thus, has the liberty to lay down 
the procedure for such appointment in its articles in any matter it 
deems fit.
Effect of the Companies Amendment Act
In order to facilitate ease of doing business in India, the Act was further amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (“Amendment Act”),
 which received the assent of the President on May 25, 2015. This 
amendment was a welcome move and a private company might want to keep 
few provisions of the Amendment Act in mind while drafting its articles 
or restated articles.
Common Seal:
 While the Companies Act 1956 and the Act (of 2013) both required every 
company to have a common seal, and the model articles of association of a
 private limited company (as provided in Table F of Schedule I) also 
contains provisions as to such common seal, the Amendment Act has made 
the requirement of having a common seal, optional. Every place where 
authorisation by means of such seal was required, has been amended to 
require authorisation by two directors or by one director and the 
company secretary, where there’s no such seal. Hence, while drafting the
 articles, a private company (although, it is applicable for every 
company) should keep this in mind.
Related Party Transactions:
 While the exemption notification has relaxed the definition of related 
party for private companies, the Amendment Act has relaxed the 
procedural aspect as well. A related party transaction (which crosses 
the prescribed threshold) required the consent of the members obtained 
at a general meeting, by passing a special resolution. Under the 
Amendment Act, a company can now pass an ordinary resolution to that 
effect. The provision requiring passing of a special resolution by the 
holding company has also been done away with. Although, as the exemption
 notification excludes the holding companies from the definition of 
related party, this provision holds little importance to private 
companies.
Payment of Dividend:
 Section 123 of the Act lays down the provisions for declaration of 
dividend. The Amendment Act has modified this Section to add a new 
provision which lays down that no company shall declare dividend unless 
the carried over previous losses and the depreciation not provided in 
previous year or years are set off against profit of the company for the
 current year. If a company wishes to lay down detailed regulations 
governing the distribution of dividend, it might add the amended 
provisions of Section 123 thereto.
The
 constitutional documents of a company are the most important documents.
 The articles lay down regulations for operation of the company. For 
this reason, having detailed articles of association helps a company in 
various ways. The Indian judiciary has, time and again, given more 
preference to the articles over any other agreement. If a company 
reflects the abovementioned provisions in its articles, it would be 
fruitful to incorporate the amendments made to the applicable laws and 
to avail the relaxations provided by the Government. 
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya 
                                                                                                    
No comments:
Post a Comment