INCOME TAX ACT |
SECTION 2(42C) |
CAPITAL GAINS - SLUMP SALE |
Where
assessee sold its entire shareholding in its subsidiary company to a
third party, since sale consideration was received by assessee itself
and not by said subsidiary, it could not be treated as slump sale within
meaning of section 2(42C) - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 161 (Mumbai - Trib.)
|
SECTION 13 |
CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TRUST - DENIAL OF EXEMPTION |
Sub-section (1)(c) : Where
there was failure by Assessing Officer to indicate in assessment order
that salary paid by assessee-society to executive director was
unreasonable, no violation of provision of section 13(1)(c) could be
alleged and exemption could not be denied - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 95 (Hyderabad - Trib.)
|
SECTION 40A(2) |
BUSINESS DISALLOWANCE - EXCESSIVE OR UNREASONABLE PAYMENTS |
Others : Where
assessee had sold molasses to its sister concern at sale price varied
between Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 3,500 per metric ton and Assessing Officer
adopted Rs. 6,000 as being uniform price throughout year and Tribunal
confirmed this, since assessee had sold molasses only at rate being
fixed by Sales Committee, order of Tribunal was erroneous - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 108 (Karnataka)
|
SECTION 119 |
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES - INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBORDINATE AUTHORITY |
Delay in filing return : Where
assessee had miserably failed to convince that he had any 'genuine
hadrship' in filing his income-tax return late by 30 months, no benefit
of section 119(2) could be given to him to claim any refund - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 104 (Punjab & Haryana)
|
SECTION 145 |
METHOD OF ACCOUNTING - REJECTION OF ACCOUNTS |
Qualitative records : Books of account could not be rejected merely because qualitative records was not maintained - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 106 (Rajasthan)
|
METHOD OF ACCOUNTING - VALUATION OF STOCK |
Illustrations : Where
assessee adopted cost value for purpose of computation of closing stock
of molasses and bagasse and Assessing Officer held that assessee should
have adopted market value and Tribunal confirmed this, since Tribunal
had overlooked material available, matter required reconsideration - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 108 (Karnataka)
|
SECTION 234E |
DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE - FEES FOR DEFAULTS IN FURNISHING STATEMENTS |
Position prior to 1-6-2015 : Prior
to 1-6-2015, there was no enabling provision in section 200A for
raising demand in respect of levy of fees under section 234E in respect
of default in furnishing TDS statements - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 105 (Amritsar - Trib.)
|
SECTION 255 |
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - PROCEDURE OF |
Special Bench : Where
Competent Authority placed matter before a Division Bench of Tribunal
for giving effect to majority opinion of Accountant Member and Third
Member and assessee raised objections urging to adjourn matter or refer
matter to President for Constitution of a Special Bench, objections were
liable to be rejected and majority view deserved to be confirmed - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 109 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)
|
SECTION 256 |
HIGH COURT - REFERENCE TO |
In
a reference u/s 256,it is not permissible for High Court to make a
fresh determination of facts found by ITAT. However, HC can take into
account additional facts already on record but not taken note of by ITAT
to arrive at its findings. HC can also construe certain facts found by
ITAT of significance as against the contrary view of ITAT that they were
of no significance. There is all the difference between making
determination of new or additional facts by HC(which is not permissible)
and emphasis on facts found by ITAT on which there is no dispute(which
is permissible) - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 194 (SC)
|
CENVAT CREDIT RULES |
RULE 3 |
CENVAT CREDIT - UTILIZATION OF, IN CASE OF REVERSE CHARGE |
In
case of import of services under section 66A, assessee is deemed to be
service provider only for purpose of paying service tax; insofar as
Cenvat credit is concerned, imported service cannot be regarded as
output service and, therefore, credit balance cannot be used to pay
service tax under reverse charge on imported services. -[2016] 65 taxmann.com 100 (New Delhi - CESTAT)
|
STATUTES |
DIRECT TAX LAWS |
Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, 2016 - NOTIFICATION [F.NO.4(19)-W&M/2014], DATED 14-1-2016
|
CORPORATE LAWS |
Guidance note on meeting of the Board of Directors (SS-1) and General Meetings (SS-2) - PRESS RELEASE, DATED 18-1-2016
|
INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST./EX./CUS. & (CST & VAT)) |
Filing of Reconciliation Return for the Year 2014-15 - CIRCULAR NO.34 OF 2015-16, DATED 15-1-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
|
Subscribe via Email
Wednesday, 20 January 2016
Daily Updates and News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment