INCOME TAX ACT |
SECTION 12A |
CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TRUST - REGISTRATION OF |
Condition precedent : While
granting registration to a trust, authorities is empowered to examine
only genuineness of trust and its activities; during assessment only
eligibility in terms of sections 10, 11 and 12 is to be verified as to
whether or not what was professed was indeed in Deed of trust - [2016] 67 taxmann.com 230 (Kerala)
|
SECTION 69C |
UNEXPLAINED EXPENDITURE |
Reassessment : Where
assessee had furnished its explanation on each and every seized
document and after considering same Assessing Officer completed original
assessment, reopening of assessment on basis of observation of first
appellate authority in subsequent assessment year that for relevant
assessment year, Assessing Officer should work out exact figure of bogus
purchase on basis of seized bill book, was invalid -[2016] 67 taxmann.com 231 (Allahabad)
|
SECTION 115JB |
MINIMUM ALTERNATE TAX |
Where
assessee company incurred loss on transfer of its investment division
to another company which was debited to profit and loss account, said
loss could not be added back for computation of its book profit under
section 115JB and, thus, revisional order passed by Commissioner on
aforesaid basis deserved to be set aside -[2016] 67 taxmann.com 281 (Calcutta)
|
SECTION 253 |
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - APPEAL TO |
Cross objections : No cross objections are maintainable in an appeal against order of revision in terms of section 253(4) - [2016] 67 taxmann.com 229 (Karnataka)
|
SECTION 263 |
REVISION - OF ORDERS PREJUDICIAL TO INTEREST OF REVENUE |
Scope of jurisdiction : Where
original assessment order had been revised under section 264 and, thus,
no longer existed, order passed by Commissioner under section 263
revising original assessment was void ab initio -[2016] 67 taxmann.com 229 (Karnataka)
|
COMPANIES ACT |
SECTION 391 |
COMPROMISE AND ARRANGEMENT |
Where
a company sought sanction of de-merger of its real estate divisions, as
company had no operative real estate business or undertaking, scheme of
de-merger appeared to be a plain transfer of land to avoid tax, capital
gains and stamp duty and hence could not have been sanctioned - [2016] 67 taxmann.com 227 (Rajasthan)
|
STATUTES |
DIRECT TAX LAWS |
Section 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Exemptions - Statutory Body/Authority/Board/Commissio
|
Section
90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Double Taxation Agreement – Agreement
for avoidance of Double Taxation and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with
Foreign Countries – Indonesia - NOTIFICATION NO. SO 1144(E) [NO.17/2016 (F.NO.503/4/2005-FTD-II)], DATED 16-3-2016
|
Senior Citizens' Welfare Fund Rules, 2016 - NOTIFICATION NO.GSR 322(E) [F.NO.13/20/2014-NS.II], DATED 18-3-2016
|
INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST./EX./CUS. & (CST & VAT)) |
Review
under section 129A(2) or section 129D of Customs Act, 1962; section
35B(2) or section 35E of Central Excise Act, 1944 and section 86(2A) or
section 86(2) of Finance Act, 1994 - INSTRUCTION F.NO.390/REVIEW/36/2014-JC, DATED 17-3-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
|
Subscribe via Email
Sunday, 27 March 2016
Daily Updates and News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment