INCOME TAX ACT | |||
| |||
SECTION 9 | |||
INCOME - DEEMED TO ACCRUE OR ARISE IN INDIA | |||
Deduction
of export commission paid to foreign agents for sourcing of export
orders in favour of assesse-firm without deduction of tax at source
under section 195 is to be allowed where export commission paid to
foreign brokers is not a sum chargeable to tax in hands of foreign
brokers as contemplated under section 195 and is neither a fee for
technical/managerial services as defined in explanation 2 to Section
9(1)(vii) so as to bring it to tax under fiction created by deeming
provisions of Section 9 - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 30 (Mumbai - Trib.)
| |||
SECTION 14A | |||
EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN RELATION TO INCOME NOT INCLUDIBLE IN TOTAL INCOME | |||
Interest
paid to partners on capital contribution is not a statutory allowance
under section 40(b) but is an expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) and,
thus, if this expenditure is incurred in relation to income which does
not form part of total income as envisaged under section 14A, same shall
only be allowed as deduction only against exempt income under section
14A or in other words, such interest expenditure on partner's capital
shall be disallowed under section 14A - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 30 (Mumbai - Trib.)
| |||
SECTION 271(1)(c) | |||
PENALTY - FOR CONCEALMENT OF INCOME | |||
Where
assessee had only claimed expenditure which was disallowed by AO and
due to which carry forward loss arose. It could not be said that
assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of income by showing
carried forward loss as once a loss was shown in e-return, the software
suo-motu reflects the returned loss as carried forward loss. Further,
the fact that assessee had not claimed carry forward loss in subsequent
year was evident of the fact that there was no intent on part of
assessee to furnish inaccurate particulars - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 27 (Bombay)
| |||
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT | |||
SECTION 9 | |||
COMPOSITION OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL - GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE | |||
As
per principles of tracing benefits acquired by fraud, breach of
confidence, breach of fiduciary relationships or by other wrongdoings do
not get benefit under the defence of change of position. Change of
position as a defence has to be casually linked to the receipt that
makes it inequitable for the recipient to make restitution. Mere fact
that the recipient has spent the money in whole or in part does not make
it inequitable as expenditure might have been incurred by him in any
event in ordinary course of things. But a bona fide recipient is
entitled to establish the defence that he had increased his outgoings as
a result of the receipt. Since analogous principles have to be applied
in the instant case, the sketchy pleadings and no material save and
except the shareholding pattern in Southend does not entitle VSL to any
tracing order against Southend which is an independent entity -[2016] 66 taxmann.com 29 (Delhi)
| |||
CUSTOMS ACT | |||
SECTION 112 | |||
PENALTY - SMUGGLING/ILLEGAL IMPORT | |||
Penalty under Customs can be imposed simultaneously on firm and its partners: Larger bench of HC - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 49 (Bombay)
| |||
STATUTES | |||
DIRECT TAX LAWS | |||
Government Sets up Tax Policy Research Unit and Tax Policy Council - PRESS RELEASE, DATED 2-2-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya |
Subscribe via Email
Thursday, 4 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment