INCOME TAX ACT |
SECTION 32 |
DEPRECIATION - ALLOWANCE/RATE OF |
Plant : Expenditure
incurred by assessee-AOP on acquiring trademarks, copyright and
know-how of erstwhile firm would come within definition of 'plant' and,
thus, assessee's claim for depreciation in respect of same was to be
allowed - [2015] 62 taxmann.com 400 (SC)
|
SECTION 37(1) |
BUSINESS EXPENDITURE - ALLOWABILITY OF |
Legal expenses : Where
erstwhile firm's business was purchased as going concern by
assessee-AOP formed by some partners of erstwhile-firm, legal expenses
subsequently incurred by AOP for defending business of going concern and
for protecting its interests were to be allowed as deduction under
section 37(1) - [2015] 62 taxmann.com 400 (SC)
|
SECTION 260A |
HIGH COURT - APPEALS TO |
Scope of : In absence of substantial question of law being framed, High Court can not upset final finding of fact arrived at by Tribunal - [2015] 62 taxmann.com 400 (SC)
|
COMPANIES ACT |
SECTION 108 |
TRANSFER OF SHARES - NOT TO BE REGISTERED EXCEPT ON PRODUCTION OF INSTRUMENT OF TRANSFER |
Where
there was no evidence on record to establish that share transfer deed
was executed by petitioner transferring his shares, shareholding of
petitioner in company was to be restored - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 223 (CLB - New Delhi)
|
SECTION 284 |
DIRECTORS - REMOVAL OF |
Where
no special notice as per section 284(2) was given for holding EGM to
remove petitioner as director of company, his removal was patently
illegal - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 223 (CLB - New Delhi)
|
SECTION 399 |
OPPRESSION AND MISMANAGEMENT - RIGHT TO APPLY |
Petition
for rectification of register of member alleging illegal transfer of
petitioner's share could not be challenged on ground of lack of required
member of shareholding - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 223 (CLB - New Delhi)
|
SECTION 433 |
WINDING UP - CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH COMPANY MAY BE WOUND UP |
Where
there was no privity of contract between petitioner and
respondent-company, and respondent had also not acknowledged its debt,
it was not liable to make any payment to petitioner, hence petition for
winding up respondent-company at instance of petitioner was not
maintainable - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 222 (Gujarat)
|
CST & VAT |
SECTION 11 OF GUJARAT VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 |
TAX INCIDENCE AND LEVY - TAX CREDIT |
Where
assessee purchased castor oil seeds for manufacture of castor oil and
after crushing same obtained castor oil as well as deoiled cake (waste)
and it used deoiled cake in furnace as a fuel in manufacture of castor
oil, action of Assessing Authority in disallowing input tax credit for
use of deoiled cake was not proper - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 236 (Gujarat)
|
STATUTES |
INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST./EX./CUS. & (CST & VAT)) |
Delhi VAT -Framing of central assessments - CIRCULAR NO.38 OF 2015-16 [NO.F.3(636)/POLICY/VAT/2016/1
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
|
Subscribe via Email
Tuesday, 23 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment