| INCOME TAX ACT |
| SECTION 32 |
| DEPRECIATION - RATE/ALLOWANCE OF |
Additional depreciation : If
plant and machinery eligible for additional depreciation under section
32(1)(iia) is put to use for less than 180 days in said financial year
and, therefore, only 50 per cent of additional depreciation can be
claimed in that year, balance 50 per cent can be availed in subsequent
year - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 4 (Karnataka)
|
| SECTION 244A |
| REFUNDS – INTEREST ON |
Where
TDS u/s 195 becomes refundable to resident deductor on account on
non-resident payee waiving the payment and the resident deductor delays
filing the refund application to the Department(files it 18 months after
the date of waiver by non-resident), he will be entitled to interest on
refund u/s 244-A only from the date of filing the refund claim only and
not from date of deposit of TDS as law favours the vigilant only and
not those who slumber and Department cannot be made liable for interest
for any period prior to the date on which facts giving rise to refund
are brought to the Department's notice - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 50 (Bombay)
|
| CST & VAT |
| SECTION 5 OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 |
| TAX, IMPOSITION OF – EXEMPTION |
Procedure
for grant of exemption had undergone a sea change after 1.4.2005 and
condition of ineligibility of unit, if it collects tax, had been done
away with - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 5 (Karnataka)
|
| STATUTES |
| CORPORATE LAWS |
Settlement of Export/Import transactions in currencies not having a Direct Exchange Rate - A.P. (DIR SERIES 2015-16) CIRCULAR NO.42, DATED 4-2-2016
|
| INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST/CE. & CUS./CST & VAT) |
Cenvat Credit (Second Amendment) Rules, 2016 – Amendment in Rules 2 and 3 - NOTIFICATION NO.2/2016-C.E. (N.T.), DATED 3-2-2016
|
Section
5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Power to grant exemption from duty
of excise - Omnibus general exemption to goods specified in Chapters 1
to 98 of Tariff – Refund of excise duty on purchase of cars by
physically handicapped persons - CIRCULAR NO.1015/3/2016-CX, DATED 3-2-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya |
Subscribe via Email
Friday, 5 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
Thursday, 4 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
| INCOME TAX ACT | |||
| |||
| SECTION 9 | |||
| INCOME - DEEMED TO ACCRUE OR ARISE IN INDIA | |||
Deduction
of export commission paid to foreign agents for sourcing of export
orders in favour of assesse-firm without deduction of tax at source
under section 195 is to be allowed where export commission paid to
foreign brokers is not a sum chargeable to tax in hands of foreign
brokers as contemplated under section 195 and is neither a fee for
technical/managerial services as defined in explanation 2 to Section
9(1)(vii) so as to bring it to tax under fiction created by deeming
provisions of Section 9 - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 30 (Mumbai - Trib.)
| |||
| SECTION 14A | |||
| EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN RELATION TO INCOME NOT INCLUDIBLE IN TOTAL INCOME | |||
Interest
paid to partners on capital contribution is not a statutory allowance
under section 40(b) but is an expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) and,
thus, if this expenditure is incurred in relation to income which does
not form part of total income as envisaged under section 14A, same shall
only be allowed as deduction only against exempt income under section
14A or in other words, such interest expenditure on partner's capital
shall be disallowed under section 14A - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 30 (Mumbai - Trib.)
| |||
| SECTION 271(1)(c) | |||
| PENALTY - FOR CONCEALMENT OF INCOME | |||
Where
assessee had only claimed expenditure which was disallowed by AO and
due to which carry forward loss arose. It could not be said that
assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of income by showing
carried forward loss as once a loss was shown in e-return, the software
suo-motu reflects the returned loss as carried forward loss. Further,
the fact that assessee had not claimed carry forward loss in subsequent
year was evident of the fact that there was no intent on part of
assessee to furnish inaccurate particulars - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 27 (Bombay)
| |||
| ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT | |||
| SECTION 9 | |||
| COMPOSITION OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL - GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE | |||
As
per principles of tracing benefits acquired by fraud, breach of
confidence, breach of fiduciary relationships or by other wrongdoings do
not get benefit under the defence of change of position. Change of
position as a defence has to be casually linked to the receipt that
makes it inequitable for the recipient to make restitution. Mere fact
that the recipient has spent the money in whole or in part does not make
it inequitable as expenditure might have been incurred by him in any
event in ordinary course of things. But a bona fide recipient is
entitled to establish the defence that he had increased his outgoings as
a result of the receipt. Since analogous principles have to be applied
in the instant case, the sketchy pleadings and no material save and
except the shareholding pattern in Southend does not entitle VSL to any
tracing order against Southend which is an independent entity -[2016] 66 taxmann.com 29 (Delhi)
| |||
| CUSTOMS ACT | |||
| SECTION 112 | |||
| PENALTY - SMUGGLING/ILLEGAL IMPORT | |||
Penalty under Customs can be imposed simultaneously on firm and its partners: Larger bench of HC - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 49 (Bombay)
| |||
| STATUTES | |||
| DIRECT TAX LAWS | |||
Government Sets up Tax Policy Research Unit and Tax Policy Council - PRESS RELEASE, DATED 2-2-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya |
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
| INCOME TAX ACT |
| SECTION 37(1) |
| BUSINESS EXPENDITURE - ALLOWABILITY OF |
Deferred revenue expenditure : Where
decision to abandon project was taken in relevant year, balance
deferred revenue expenditure relating to said project would be deemed to
arise in relevant year and would be allowed as such - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 311 (Calcutta)
|
| SECTION 68 |
| CASH CREDIT |
Share capital : Where
it was alleged that on-money received in cash by real estate companies
from flat purchasers was routed back in those companies in form of share
capital/ unsecured loans, etc. using assessee as a conduit, unless
identity and creditworthiness of concerned fund owner were confirmed,
addition made in hands of assessee could not be deleted - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 310 (Delhi)
|
| SECTION 254 |
| APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - POWERS OF |
Power to recall : Where
assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before
Tribunal, Tribunal was justified in recalling its ex parte order and
rehearing appeal already disposed of on merit - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 311 (Calcutta)
|
| COMPANIES ACT |
| SECTION 166 OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 |
| DIRECTOR - PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT OF OFFICE BY |
Director's
grievance against company./co-director does not justify violation of
his/her fiduciary duties under section 166 of the Companies Act,2013 by
carrying on a business competing with that of the company. If he/she had
any grievances, he/ she can avail the remedy but there is hardly any
justification to start parallel/similar to the business of the company.
In the present case, the defendant No.1 being a director in running the
business in which she was participating in all activities still chose to
start her independent business in competing the business of her own
company. The act of the defendant No.1 was prima facie not bonafide as
it was done for monetary purposes - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 18 (Delhi)
|
| SECTION 433 |
| WINDING UP - CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A COMPANY MAY BE WOUND UP |
Mere
filing of application for recovery of debt before Tribunal under
provisions of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions
Act, 1993 would not entail a bar in law to laying a winding up petition
under provisions of Companies Act where conditions provided therefor are
proved to have been satisfied - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 312 (Rajasthan)
|
| SARFAESI ACT |
| SECTION 15 |
| MANNER AND EFFECT OF TAKE OVER OF MANAGEMENT |
SARFAESI
Act, 2002 prevails over the Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act, 1985 to the extent of inconsistency therewith. Section
15(1) proviso 3 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)
Act, 1985. 3 covers all references pending before the BIFR, no matter
whether such reference is at the inquiry stage, scheme stage, or winding
up stage. This being so, it is clear that in any case the present
reference under Section 15(1) of the Appellant No. 1 company has abated
inasmuch as more than 3/4th of the secured creditors involved have taken
steps under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of
Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - [2016] 66 taxmann.com 17 (SC)
|
| CENTRAL EXCISE ACT |
| SECTION 11A |
| RECOVERY - OF DUTY OR TAX NOT LEVIED/PAID OR SHORT-LEVIED/PAID OR ERRONEOUSLY REFUNDED - ADJUDICATION OF DEMAND |
Where
different laboratories give different chemical report over composition
of product manufactured by assessee and Department seeks to reply upon
report of Chief Chemist in its favour, assessee is justified in seeking
response to queries and also cross-examination of Chief Chemist; hence,
non-grant of opportunity to cross-examine would violate principles of
natural justice - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 313 (Gujarat)
|
| SECTION 35G |
| APPEALS - APPEALS TO HIGH COURT (JURISDICTIONAL COURT) |
Where
assessee's unit was situated at Silvassa within Union Territory of
Dadra, Nagar and Haveli, even if Adjudicating Authority, Vapi [Gujarat]
had issued show cause notice and part of investigation had taken place
at Vapi, writ petition against assessment order could be brought before
Bombay High Court - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 315 (Gujarat)
|
| STATUTES |
| CORPORATE LAWS |
Report of Companies Law Committee - PRESS RELEASE
|
FDI
– Reporting under FDI Scheme, mandatory filing of Form ARF, FDGPR and
FCTRS on E-Biz Platform and Discontinuation of Physical Filing From 8-2-2016 - A.P. (DIR SERIES 2015-16) CIRCULAR NO.40, DATED 1-2-2016
|
| INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST/CE. & CUS./CST & VAT) |
Andhra
Pradesh Pradesh Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2016 – Amendment In
Sections 2, 4, 13, 21, 22, 31, 32, 34, 38, 39, 45 & 47 And Insertion
Of Section 4A - [ACT NO.4 OF 2016], DATED 12-1-2016
|
Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2016 – Amendment in Sections 3A, 14 & 70 - NOTIFICATION NO.LG-01-01/2016/04LEG., DATED 28-1-2016
|
Submission of Form DP-1 online by all Dealers – Extension of date thereof - NOITIFICATION NO.F.3(352)POLICY/VAT/2013/
|
Inclusion of show cause notice's issued in relation to levy of CVD on Vessels imported for breaking in call-book -CIRCULAR NO.1014/2/2016-CX
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya |
Tuesday, 2 February 2016
Drafting the Articles of a Private Company
Drafting the Articles of a Private Company
With
India’s Startup India Action Plan in force, it is expected that in the
coming years a large number of entrepreneurs would incorporate their
entities to enter a startup friendly Indian market. Any startup would
need its very own constitutional documents, i.e. articles of association
and memorandum of association. While incorporating a company with the
standard documents available online is more pocket-friendly, drafting
the constitutional documents to one’s specific need is always more
effective and ideal. Especially with subsequent amendment to the
Companies Act, 2013 and the exemptions provided to the private companies
under the notification dated June 5, 2015,
every startup has the advantage of drafting its constitutional
documents accordingly, which allows it to comply with less strict
provisions. This post discusses the exemptions available to private
companies or the amended provisions to be kept in mind while a startup
drafts its articles of association or an existing private company alters
its existing articles.
Effect of the Exemption Notification
Under the provisions of Section 462 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”),
the Central Government has the power to declare which provisions of the
Act shall not be applicable to a certain class/classes of companies, if
it thinks it is necessary for public interest. The Central Government,
exercising its power, has published the exemption notification on June
5, 2015. This notification is applicable only to private companies as
defined under Section 2(68) of the Act and shall not be applicable to
deemed public companies. A private company is defined as a company which
has a minimum paid-up capital and which restricts the right to transfer
its shares. Such a company shall have at most 200 members. Whereas, a
subsidiary of a public company is deemed to be a public company for the
purposes of the Act, even if such company is incorporated as a private
company. The exemptions available to a private company, which can be
incorporated in its articles, are discussed below.
Relaxation in Related Party Transaction:
If one wishes to incorporate the matter of related party transactions,
it is necessary to remember the relaxation provided therein for private
companies. As per the exemption notification, a private company shall
not be a related party of:
i. its holding, subsidiary or an associate company; or
ii. a subsidiary of a holding company to which the private company is also subsidiary.
Hence,
any contract or arrangement of such nature shall not require any
approval under section 188 of the Act. Moreover, in accordance with the
provisions of the exemption notification, a member shall not be
disqualified to vote on the resolution required to be passed to approve
any arrangement or contract to which such member is a related party.
Kinds of Share Capital and Voting Rights: Section 43 of the Act lays down that, a company, limited by shares, shall have two kinds of share capital viz.
equity share capital and preference share capital. Section 47 deals
with the voting rights attached to the shares. These provisions, read
with the rules made thereunder, restrict the rights of a company limited
by shares to issue shares with differential rights and require strict
compliance with the rules made for this purpose. The exemption
notification lays down that if the articles or memorandum of association
so provide(s), the provisions of Sections 43 and 47 shall not be
applicable to private companies.
The
implication of this exemption is that, a private company shall have the
liberty to decide the kind of share capital it wishes to have or the
voting rights attached to any class of shares. So, the startup drafting
its articles, or a company amending its existing articles can now amend
its articles in a way which would allow them to issue equity shares of a
new class which may or may not contain any voting rights, while under
the provisions of Section 47, the equity shareholders always enjoyed the
right to vote at all resolutions placed before its members. Again, a
company can even issue preference shares with such mandatory voting
rights, i.e. the preference shareholders shall have the right to
vote in resolution placed before the members, even if such resolution
does not concern those shareholders.
However,
one must keep in mind that if the memorandum or articles of a company
do(es) not provide that the provisions of sections 43 and 47 shall not
be applicable, such private company would continue to be bound by the
provisions of those two sections. In addition to section 47, section 106
of the Act also provides for certain restriction on voting rights. The
exemption notification lays down that the provisions of that section
shall continue to be applicable on private companies unless the section
provides otherwise, or unless the articles of the company provide
otherwise.
ESOP:
If the articles are to provide for the issuance of shares through any
employees’ stock option plan as per the provision of section 62(1)(b),
now they might state that such issuance shall be made through an
ordinary resolution passed by the members at a general meeting, although
the company is free to continue to insert more restrictive provisions
than the ones prescribed under the Act.
Borrowing Powers:
While drafting the articles related to the borrowing power of a private
limited company, one must remember that although the provisions of
sections 73 shall continue to be applicable to private companies, the
prohibition on acceptance of deposits from public would not be
applicable in case a private company accepts from its members any amount
exceeding 100% of aggregate of the paid-up share capital and free
reserves.
Notice of Meeting:
Section 101 of the Act and Secretarial Standard on General Meetings lay
down that a company requires to provide at least 21 days’ clear notice
before commencing a general meeting, annual or otherwise. A meeting can
also be convened at a shorter notice if at least 95% of the members give
their consent for the meeting. A company shall also be free to impose
stricter provisions than the prescribed ones. The exemption notification
has, however, relaxed these provisions and it lays down that if the
articles of association of a private limited company otherwise provide,
the provisions of section 101 shall not be applicable to such company.
Hence, the company shall be at liberty to decide the provisions
governing the notice of general meetings.
Explanatory Statement, Quorum, Chairman, and Proxy:
Sections 102 to 105 lay down the provisions governing explanatory
statements, quorum for general meeting, the procedure to elect the
chairman of a general meeting, and the procedure to provide proxies.
While the provisions of these sections would continue to govern private
companies, if however, the articles of a private company provide
otherwise, such provisions would not be applicable. Hence, a private
company now has the option to provide for its own regulations with
respect to notice of general meeting, statement to be annexed to notice,
quorum for meetings, chairman of meetings and proxies in its articles.
In addition to the foregoing, each private company would also have the
power to decide its own regulations regarding voting by show of hands
and/or demand for poll, as provided under section 107 and section 109 of
the Act respectively. The relaxation provided under the exemption
notification is expected to reduce the compliance requirements with
respect to general meetings of a private limited company, subject to its
articles.
Appointment & Powers of Directors:
Although a private limited company has the liberty to provide in its
articles that any retiring director shall not be eligible to stand for
directorship, the provisions to that effect provided in the Act would
not be applicable to such a company. Hence, any such requirement would
solely be subject to the choice of the company. In addition to the
foregoing, none of the restrictions applicable to the board of
directors, under the provisions of Section 180 of the Act, shall be
applicable to the board of a private company. Any interested director of
such company can now participate in any meeting where such subject of
interest is discussed, subject to disclosure of his/her interest. Hence,
a company drafting its articles may want to keep this in mind.
Appointment of WTD/MD/Manager: As per the provisions of section 196(4), every company shall appoint a whole time director (“WTD”), managing director (“MD”)
and/or manager with the approval of the board (obtained at a board
meeting), which shall be approved by the members at the next general
meeting of the company. Such appointment would also require compliance
with the provisions of Section 197 and Schedule V of the Act. Any
variation to the conditions specified under Schedule V would, in
addition, require the approval of the Central Government. Every company
usually specifies the manner in which such WTD, MD or manager can be
appointed, in its articles. The private companies are now exempted from
this requirement, as the provisions of both sub-section 4 and 5 of
section 196 shall not be applicable to such companies. Thus, no approval
is required by a private company at its board meeting or at a
subsequent general meeting. They do not need to comply with the
provisions of section 197 of the Act, dealing with managerial
remuneration or, the conditions laid down under Schedule V. Hence, any
variation thereto would not require any approval from the Central
Government either. A private company, thus, has the liberty to lay down
the procedure for such appointment in its articles in any matter it
deems fit.
Effect of the Companies Amendment Act
In order to facilitate ease of doing business in India, the Act was further amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (“Amendment Act”),
which received the assent of the President on May 25, 2015. This
amendment was a welcome move and a private company might want to keep
few provisions of the Amendment Act in mind while drafting its articles
or restated articles.
Common Seal:
While the Companies Act 1956 and the Act (of 2013) both required every
company to have a common seal, and the model articles of association of a
private limited company (as provided in Table F of Schedule I) also
contains provisions as to such common seal, the Amendment Act has made
the requirement of having a common seal, optional. Every place where
authorisation by means of such seal was required, has been amended to
require authorisation by two directors or by one director and the
company secretary, where there’s no such seal. Hence, while drafting the
articles, a private company (although, it is applicable for every
company) should keep this in mind.
Related Party Transactions:
While the exemption notification has relaxed the definition of related
party for private companies, the Amendment Act has relaxed the
procedural aspect as well. A related party transaction (which crosses
the prescribed threshold) required the consent of the members obtained
at a general meeting, by passing a special resolution. Under the
Amendment Act, a company can now pass an ordinary resolution to that
effect. The provision requiring passing of a special resolution by the
holding company has also been done away with. Although, as the exemption
notification excludes the holding companies from the definition of
related party, this provision holds little importance to private
companies.
Payment of Dividend:
Section 123 of the Act lays down the provisions for declaration of
dividend. The Amendment Act has modified this Section to add a new
provision which lays down that no company shall declare dividend unless
the carried over previous losses and the depreciation not provided in
previous year or years are set off against profit of the company for the
current year. If a company wishes to lay down detailed regulations
governing the distribution of dividend, it might add the amended
provisions of Section 123 thereto.
The
constitutional documents of a company are the most important documents.
The articles lay down regulations for operation of the company. For
this reason, having detailed articles of association helps a company in
various ways. The Indian judiciary has, time and again, given more
preference to the articles over any other agreement. If a company
reflects the abovementioned provisions in its articles, it would be
fruitful to incorporate the amendments made to the applicable laws and
to avail the relaxations provided by the Government.
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
Monday, 1 February 2016
Daily Updates and News
| INCOME TAX ACT |
| SECTION 10B |
| EXPORT ORIENTED UNDERTAKING |
Computation of deduction : Interest
on FDRs which were under lien with Bank for facilitating letter of
credit and bank guarantee facilities would qualify for deduction under
section 10B - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 287 (Delhi)
|
| SECTION 14A |
| EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN RELATION TO INCOME NOT INCLUDIBLE IN TOTAL INCOME |
Rule 8D : Disallowance
made under section 14A, read with rule 8D, towards interest expenditure
would not be tenable where Assessing Officer failed to establish a
nexus between interest bearing funds and investment made - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 295 (Karnataka)
|
| SECTION 32 |
| DEPRECIATION - ALLOWANCE/RATE OF |
Goodwill : Where
assessee purchased business as going concern, consideration paid in
excess of value of tangible assets was classifiable as goodwill eligible
for depreciation and, therefore, further exercise to value goodwill was
not warranted - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 288 (Delhi)
|
| SECTION 153 |
| ASSESSMENT - TIME-LIMIT FOR COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT |
Limitation
for purpose of section 153 would start from end of assessment year in
which notice under section 148 is served upon assessee and not from end
of assessment year in which such notice is issued - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 293 (Bombay)
|
| SECTION 275 |
| PENALTY - BAR OF LIMITATION FOR IMPOSITION |
Pending assessment : Where
appeal of assessee against addition made in assessment was pending
before Tribunal, order imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c) was
premature - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 293 (Bombay)
|
| CENVAT CREDIT RULES |
| RULE 2(l) |
| CENVAT CREDIT - INPUT SERVICE |
Advertisement and Sales Promotion : Where
principally agreement is to appoint agent/stockist for storing and
selling goods of assessee, such stockist would be 'commission agent' and
not 'sales promotion agent'; hence, commission so paid to him is
ineligible for credit. - [2016] 65 taxmann.com 283 (Gujarat)
|
| STATUTES |
| CORPORATE LAWS |
Revision in Position Limits for Agricultural Commodities - CIRCULAR NO.CDMRD/DMP/ CIR/32/2016, DATED 29-1-2016
|
| INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST./EX./CUS. & (CST & VAT)) |
Rajasthan
Value Added Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2016 – Amendment in Rules 14, 16,
22A, 33 and Form VAT-01 and Substitution of Rules 12, 13, 25 & 77 - NOTIFICATION NO.F.12(79)FD/TAX/ 2014-111, DATED 8-1-2016
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
|
A woman can become Karta of HUF if she is eldest member of a family, rules Delhi HC
A woman can become Karta of HUF if she is eldest member of a family, Rules Delhi HC
When
someone makes mention of 'karta' in the context of an Indian family, he
invariably thinks of a male member. That has just been changed in a
landmark ruling by the Delhi High court this week.
The
Delhi high court has ruled in a landmark verdict that the eldest female
member of a family can be its "Karta". "Karta" a unique position carved
out by Hindu customs and ancient texts, denotes managership of a joint
family and has traditionally been inherited by men.
"If
a male member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), by virtue of his being
the first born eldest, can be a Karta, so can a female member. The
court finds no restriction in law preventing the eldest female
co-parcenor of an HUF from being its Karta," Justice Najmi Waziri said
in this unique judgment made public earlier this week.
The
Karta occupies a position superior to that of other members of HUF and
has full authority to manage property, rituals or other crucial affairs
of the family. These include taking decisions on sale and purchase of
family assets, mutation of property, etc.
The
ruling came on a suit filed by the eldest daughter of a Delhi based
business family staking claim to be its Karta on the passing away of her
father and three uncles. The eldest son of a younger brother declared
himself to be the next Karta but was challenged by the daughter of the
eldest brother who is also the senior most member of the family.
In
the court order, Justice Waziri said that the "law gave equal rights of
inheritance to Hindu males and females, its objective is to recognise
the rights of female Hindus and to enhance their rights to equality
apropos succession.
Thanks & Regards,
Meetesh Shiroya
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)