MCA
MCA21
system will be intermittently unavailable from Friday, 19th Apr 2019 10.00 pm
to Saturday, 20th Apr 2019 02.00 am IST due to maintenance activity. Stakeholders
are requested to plan accordingly.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NEW ACCOUNTING NORMS TO
HIT ASSET-LIGHT COMPANIES
Companies
with asset-light business models are prone to be affected by the new accounting
standard on lease that came into effect from April 1, say brokerages. Ind AS
116, or the new accounting norms notified by the corporate affairs ministry, calls
for elimination of classification between operating and finance leases, thereby
recognising all leases on the lessee’s balance sheet. As a result, the balance
sheet of asset-light companies in aviation, retail, multiplex, healthcare,
logistics & warehousing and telecom sectors will expand sharply, say
Edelweiss analysts. For instance, HealthCare Global Enterprises, with the
highest rent as a percentage of revenue among hospitals, will see maximum
impact. HCG, which has 20 out of its 26 hospitals on lease, will see their
capital employed rise by 30 per cent and EBITDA will jump 50 per cent. PBT will
also be eroded 45 per cent, Edelweiss said. Similarly, most aviation companies
acquire aircraft via lease, while retail and multiplex firms in the organised
space run mainly from leased premises. Telecom firms will also have to
recognise agreements for sharing passive infrastructure in balance sheet, said
analysts. They said profitability of the firms will be adversely impacted in
the initial years, due to higher component of finance cost. Typically, longer
the lease tenure, higher the impact on profit before tax.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL
JUSTICE TO BE FOLLOWED BEFORE BRANDING A COMPANY A SHELL COMPANY, GAUHATI HC
Recently,
the Gauhati High Court, in Assam Co. India Ltd. v Union of India (2019) 213
Comp Cas 420 (Gauhati), held that the term shell company is not defined in any
statute and as such, an order branding any company as a shell company, without
serving notice or hearing, violates principles of natural justice In the
instant case, the petitioner was in the business of cultivation and manufacture
of tea, having several tea estates in the State of Assam. As per a statement
submitted to the High Court, the petitioner has 14 tea estates producing
approximately 11 million kilograms of tea per year, which are sold either
through auction or through private sale. It also employs about 20,000 workers
across these tea estates. On August 7, 2017, the petitioner came to learn that
the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had initiated proceedings
against it by instructing the Bombay Stock Exchange, National Stock Exchange
and Metropolitan Stock Exchange to restrict and/or to suspend trading of shares
of the company. The petitioner also came to learn that SEBI had initiated such
proceedings on the basis of a letter dated June 9, 2017 received from the
Government of India in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs forwarding the
database of 331 listed shell companies for initiating necessary action. After
hearing both the parties, the Court noted that the term shell company is not
defined in any statutes in India. In fact, the Parliamentary Standing Committee
on Finance had suggested that the term shell company be defined under the Companies
Act, 2013. It was also noted that the committee was of the view that all shell
companies may not have fraudulent intention Therefore, the expression shell
company was suggested to be defined as having fraudulent intent as one of the
characteristic features of such a company. The popular understanding of a shell
company was explained by the High Court in the following manner:
_16.1.
In popular parlance, a shell company is understood as having only a nominal
existence; it exists only on paper without having any office and employee. Just
like a shell which has a thick outer covering but is hollow inside, a shell
company is a corporate entity without having active business operations or
significant assets It may be used as a deliberate financial arrangement
providing service as a tool or vehicle of others without itself having any
significant assets or operations i. e., acting as a front. Popularly shell
companies are identified as companies which are used for tax evasion or money
laundering, i.e., channelizing crime tainted money or proceeds of crime into
the formal economy._
However,
the Court was quick to note that being a paper company and not having any
assets or business operations per se is no offence: a corporate entity may be
set up in such a fashion with the objective of carrying out corporate
activities in future. This, according to the High Court, was perfectly legal
and would not make it an illegal entity. The Court also placed reliance on the
definition of a shell company in the glossary of foreign direct investment
terms prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD), and Justice Radhakrishnan’s observations in Vodafone International
Holdings B.V. v. Union of India [2012] 170 Comp Cas 369 (SC). The Court then
summarized the existing situation in the following manner:
_21.
Thus, from the above, what can be deduced is that though a shell company is
defined in other jurisdictions, in India there is no statutory definition of a
shell company. However, in popular parlance as well as from the perspective of
the Government and its agencies, a shell company is ordinarily identified with
dubious activities concerning serious economic offences, such as tax evasion,
money laundering, benami transaction, conversion of black money into white,
round-tripping with host of other associated offences. The general perception
is that presence of shell companies and its potential use for illegal
activities threatens the very economic foundation of the country and severely
compromises its economic foundation and ultimately sovereignty._
In
the end, the Court held that it is no offence to be a shell company per se It
was also held that the maximum a Registrar of Companies can do is to strike off
the name of such company from the registrar of companies. But, the Court also
qualified that if the shell company is involved in money-laundering or tax
evasion, then relevant provisions under the Prohibition of Benami Transactions
Act, 2016, Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, Income-tax Act, 1961, and
the Companies Act, 2013 would be attracted. The Court held that considering the
negative implications of being branded as a shell company it was not justified
either on the part of the SFIO or SEBI to treat the petitioner as a shell
company straightaway and thereafter to initiate an investigation to justify
such branding. Adding further, it was also held that the principles of natural
justice would require that before such branding is done, the company should
have been put on notice and afforded it a reasonable opportunity of hearing as
to why and on what grounds it was being suspected to be a shell company, and
only if the response was found to be not satisfactory, such a finding could
have been recorded. In short, the Gauhati High Court held that a finding of
shell company de hors any notice or hearing would not be justified having
regard to its negative implications and serious consequences.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
IBBI SUSPENDS ERRING
INSOLVENCY PROFESSIONAL FOR TWO YEARS
Insolvency
regulator IBBI has suspended for two years the registration of Sanjay Kumar
Ruia, an insolvency professional. This follows the IBBI’s Disciplinary
Committee concluding that Ruia, a professional member of the Indian Institute
of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI, had contravened certain provisions of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of
India (IBBI) has also directed that Ruia should not seek or accept any process
or assignment or render any services under the IBC during the period of
suspension. Ruia has also been directed to undergo the pre-registration
educational course from his insolvency professional agency and work for atleast
six months as an intern with a senior insolvency professional, at any time
during the period of suspension, to improve his understanding of the IBC and
regulations made under it.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HC DISMISSES PLEA
SEEKING DIRECTIONS TO GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE JET AIRWAYS INTERIM FUNDING
The
Bombay high court on Thursday dismissed a petition seeking directions to the
government to provide interim funding to Jet Airways. Meanwhile, Kiran Pawaskar
of Jet Airways’ Officers & Staff Association said around 22,000 employees
are without a job after Jet Airways, once India’s largest private airline,
suspended operations on Wednesday. On Thursday, the division bench of chief
justice Pradeep Nandrajog and justice NM Jamdar heard a petition by advocate
Mathews Nedumpara and three others, pleading the court to direct the government
to give Jet Airways minimum funds to continue operations until the
cash-strapped airlines is sold The petition said the airline had been forced to
suspend services because the State Bank of India (SBI) and a consortium of
lenders had refused to provide critical interim funding. However, the bench
said that it had no jurisdiction to interfere and directed the petitioner to take
the matter to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) before dismissing the
petition.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LENDERS INVOKE IBC
NORMS TO KEEP STRESSED ASSETS IN NCLT
Lenders
will cite one day default clause under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to defend
their action against erring promoters taken to insolvency under the now defunct
February 12, 2018 circular of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Sources said
promoters of about half a dozen stressed power entities referred to National
Company Law Tribunal have approached the bankruptcy court to quash insolvency
proceedings against them as it has become non-maintainable following the
Supreme Court order declaring the RBI circular ultra vires. But banker's are
confident that stressed assets referred to NCLT will continue to face
bankruptcy proceedings as IBC clearly states such referral even if there is one
day delay or default by any entity in meeting its loan commitments. There is no
question that stressed assets referred to NCLT will come out from there following
the apex court's ruling. These assets continue to remain stressed and lenders
are sure that resolution under IBC framework would work best for all
stakeholders, said chairman and managing director of a leading state-owned
financial institution asking not to be named. If need be, lenders would also
file an affidavit with NCLT to continue the bankruptcy proceedings in the case
of companies that faced such action over the earlier RBI circular, he added. In
all about 70 cases with total bank exposure of about Rs 4 lakh crore was
declared as stressful by the banks post the RBI circular. This included 34
stressed power projects worth 40,000 MW having total bank of close to Rs 1.8
lakh crore. Its not that institutions, including PFC did not try to resolve certain
power projects, but none of the attempts remained successful. In the case of
KSK Mahanadi, Adani Group showed interest but it soon withdrew from the race as
lenders were divided on the level of hair cut and UP state regulator sought cut
in tariff for the project. In case of an Rs 600 crore one time settlement
scheme worked out for Lanco Amravati, the sole investor backed out from the
race at the last minute.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
‘HOMEBUYERS’ VOTING RIGHTS NEED CLARITY’
A bench of the National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) New Delhi, has ordered notices to the Union
government and Chairman, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), seeking
their views on the issue of voting rights of homebuyers and financial creditors
of Jaypee Infratech Limited. The case relates to a deadlock over resolutions to
be passed at a meeting of the firm’s committee of creditors (CoC). The
President of NCLT referred the case to the single bench, in exercise of powers
under Section 419(5) of the Companies Act 2013, after two members of the
Allahabad Bench took contrary views on the issue. As per the court filings, the
voting rights of various parties in the total debt of the company is as follows
— lenders 41.8%, homebuyers 58.10% and fixed depositors 0.01%. After two
meetings of the CoC, nine of the 10 resolutions proposed had been rejected in
view of the poor response in voting by the homebuyers compared with the en
masse participation by the lenders. As a result, the threshold voting for
passing the resolution was not met. At the CoC meeting, the resolution
professional contended that abstention from the voting process would be counted
as negative vote. Homebuyers, however, objected to it, and argued that they are
to be considered as a separate class of creditors and the rule of majority in
cases of voting by creditors in the class should be made applicable for the
corporate insolvency resolution process. The judicial member of NCLT Allahabad
ruled that in cases where the CoC comprised real estate class of creditors with
up to 50% voting share or more and when there was a deadlock in passing the
resolutions, the highest voting share in favour of the resolution had to be
taken into consideration, without looking into the threshold provision under
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, except in case of withdrawal of petition or
approval of resolution plan or liquidation. He said this would enable the
process to go on. He went on to suggest that the Centre should bring in the
necessary provisions in cases where the voting rights of homebuyers was 50% or
more and including the procedures to be followed in case of a deadlock in
passing resolutions. The technical member of NCLT Allahabad ruled that the
lasting solution to the problem could only be found by treating homebuyers as a
class and their voting pattern taken with reference to total voting share of
the class, to reflect the will of the class. The single bench, to which the
case was referred by the NCLT President, said it was important to take the
views of the Centre and IBBI, given that larger public interest was involved
and interpretation of the provisions having wider ramifications not only in
relation to the present case but also other pending cases and others which
might come in the future. It ordered issue of notices to the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs and Chairman IBBI. The notices are returnable by April 22.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
COC QUESTIONS FUND FLOW FROM SUNIL HI-TECH ARM
In a meeting of the
committee of creditors (CoC) for Seam Industries Limited — a subsidiary of
Sunil Hi-Tech — a city company, concerns have been raised on movement of funds
between the two entities. It was pointed out that the dealing could be
fraudulent too. During the CoC meeting held on Thursday, it was mentioned that
an amount of Rs 73 crore which is more than the total claim by the creditors
went from Seam Industries to Sunil Hi-Tech. The transfer took place when the
matter for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against the
company was under adjudication. Both, the parent company Sunil Hi-Tech and its
wholly owned subsidiary Seam Industries, which is located at Butibori, are
facing insolvency proceedings since nearly a year. The chairperson said the
funds were transferred when the matter for initiating CIRP was under
adjudication before the national company law tribunal (NCLT). The sum was
netted off against 2 journal vouchers. The chairman said these transaction may
also be fraudulent, depending upon the end use of these funds. It has been
mentioned in the minutes that the chairperson had also sought an explanation
from the chief financial officer (CFO) of Sunil-Hi-Tech about the transactions
but had not received any response. There was no response on the matter from
forensic auditor of Sunil Hi-Tech, say the minutes.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
BANKERS HOPE FOR LESS PAIN AS RBI READIES NEW STRESSED-ASSET
NORMS
Bankers are hoping the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will be somewhat liberal when it brings out a fresh
circular on the resolution of stressed assets. On the wish-list are an extended
timeline for filing of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) with
the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) as well as implementation of the
resolution plan, and reversal of provisions at the time of change of
management. Shaktikanta Das had said necessary steps, including the issuance of
a revised circular for quick and effective resolution of stressed assets, will
be taken. Banks have suggested to the RBI that the time period for the filing
of the CIRP with the NCLT be extended to 30 days (against 15 days in the
defunct circular) on default during the ‘specified period’. Extra time has been
sought to explore the possibility of regularisation of accounts. ‘Specified
period’ means the period from the date of implementation of the resolution plan
(RP) up to the date by which at least 20 per cent of the outstanding principal
debt as per the RP and interest capitalisation sanctioned as part of the
restructuring, if any, is repaid. Further, banks have pitched for an extension
of the 180-day timeline from the reference date for implementation of the RP in
the case of large accounts to 270 days. Bankers reasoned that implementation of
the CIRP within 180 days from the date of default — with mandate approval from
all the banks in the consortium, taking into account techno-economic viability
study, stock audit, forensic audit, completion of documentation and creation of
security interest — is difficult, especially in the case of large and complex
projects. To alleviate the impact of provisions on their bottomline, banks have
made a plea that they should be allowed to reverse provisions at the time of
change of management under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as well as outside
it.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
VARDHMAN CASE: JSW
STEEL TO MOVE NCLAT
JSW
Steel has decided to move the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal against
the NCLT order rejecting the company’s plea in the Vardhman Industries case. Last
December, the company’s resolution plan for the stressed Vardhman Industries
was approved by the NCLT. However, the committee of creditors had made
modification in the resolution plan unilaterally. JSW Steel had moved the NCLT
against the modification and sought clarification from the Tribunal before
going ahead with implementation of the resolution plan. On April 16, NCLT had
upheld the modification and rejected the company’s plea. Since certain
important relief measures sought by the company that have material bearing on
the feasibility and viability of resolution plan, have not been granted, the
company will be appealing against the said order before the relevant judicial
authority, said the company in a statement.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
JAYPEE: HOMEBUYERS'
COMPLAINTS UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT MAINTAINABLE DURING INSOLVENCY
PROCEEDINGS, SUPREME COURT
The
Supreme Court has upheld the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against Jaiprakash Associate Limited (JAL) on the
issue of maintainability of consumer complaints before NCDRC. The NCDRC had
held that consumer complaints filed by the aggrieved homebuyers against JAL can
be proceeded with before the NCDRC. These proceedings can continue during the
pendency of Insolvency proceedings against Jaypee Infratech Limited (Jaypee),
the Commission had held. Jaypee is a special purpose vehicle created by its
holding company, Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL). The Commission thus
placed as many as 300 matters involving over 14500 aggrieved homebuyers before
it. This decision was challenged before the Supreme Court by JAL. It was
contended by JAL that the Commission’s decision is likely to denude it from
pursuing its plea against the claims set up by the complainants, the
homebuyers. The Supreme Court Bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi
held that the NCDRC’s judgment was restricted to the point of maintainability
of the claim of the complainants before the NCDRC. The Court said,
_[T]he
position that the observations in the impugned judgment are for the limited
purpose of deciding the preliminary objection taken by the appellant regarding
the maintainability of the complaint before the Commission, in particular,
against the appellant JAL._
The
Court further stressed that the NCDRC’s judgment has only considered the
preliminary objection and is not an opinion on the merits of the pleas of any
of the parties. All the contentions available to the Respondents will have to
be considered on their own merits, the Court made clear.
_[A]ll
contentions available to the respondent(s) in the complaint including on the
relief of possession and refund against JAL will have to be adjudicated by the
Commission on its own merits in accordance with law uninfluenced by the
observations made in the impugned judgment._
The
NCDRC’s judgment does not give any directions to the Respondents with respect
to their claims and the Commission may do so in its final judgment. This final
judgment, however, will be subject to the outcome of the insolvency proceedings
against JAL and Jaypee before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the
Court clarified. This judgment comes in the wake of the Supreme Court’s
decision in the Chitra Sharma case wherein the Court had sent the matter back
to the NCLT for adjudicating on the issue under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code (IBC) leaving the aggrieved homebuyers in a lurch. The decision of the
NCDRC which has now been upheld by the Supreme Court validates the
maintainability of consumer claims of homebuyers against Jaypee for refunds and
damages on account of delayed possession.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'RECEIVING OC WOULDN'T
ABSOLVE DEVELOPER FROM PAYING INTEREST'
Mere
receiving an Occupation Certificate wouldn't absolve a developer from paying
interest to the home buyer if there's a delay in handing over possession. A
building had received the Occupation Certificate, even before the home buyer
went ahead with his complaint to the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory
Authority (MahaRERA) for the delay in possession. The builder argued that he
had the Occupation Certificate, but the authority held that the developer's
Occupation Certificate came after the date of possession mentioned in the
agreement and finally the home buyer was awarded interest for delay in possession.
Homebuyer Lalit Bhidur had filed the complaint against Namrata Developers Pvt
Ltd, asking MahaRERA to direct the developer to pay interest for delayed
possession and give possession of his flat in the project Namrata Eco City,
Pune. However, the developer failed to complete the project and hand over
possession of the flat till date. Thus there was a delay and he claimed
interest. The developer filed the reply on record of MahaRERA and disputed the
claims of the home buyer. He stated that the project was delayed due to the
change in the planning authority and delay in the permission given by the said
authority. The developer further submitted that they have received the
Occupancy certificate in August 2018, that is prior to the filing of the
complaint and he is ready to give possession of the flat. Vijay Satbir Singh,
heard the case and stated that in the present case, the problems faced by the
developer do not fall in the category of force majeure the home buyer,
therefore, is entitled to the interest for delay. Even though the developer has
received the OC in the year 2018, the date of possession written in the
agreement for sale is relevant to calculate the period of delay. Finally, Singh
ordered the developer to pay interest to the home buyer at marginal cost
lending rates plus two per cent for the period of delay as per mentioned in the
agreement for sale..
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HOMEBUYERS NOT ENTHUSED
BY JAYPEE GROUP PROMOTER'S OFFER OF COMPLETING DELAYED PROJECTS
Manoj
Gaur, on April 19 once again offered to complete the much-delayed real estate
projects within a period of four year by pumping in Rs 1,500 crore in an escrow
account. Homebuyers were however skeptical and termed the meeting as an
'eyewash' and questioned the timing of the meeting, saying that it was perhaps
called to garner support from homebuyers, whose approval is required for any
resolution plan or settlement plan to go through. Gaur, during the meeting with
homebuyers, claimed that he was a 'victim of circumstances' made a presentation
and proposed that Rs 1,500 crore would be set aside in an escrow account for
completion and construction of the projects within four years. Ajit Kumar,
adviser Jaypee Group, said that the company is aware of the problems faced by
homebuyers. We have submitted a proposal under Sec 12A of the IBC procedure in
April. To begin with, we will set aside Rs 1,500 crore in an escrow account
which will be monitored by a committee. The entire amount will be used for
construction and completion of the houses. The monitoring committee would
constitute a retired judge of a Supreme Court, a technical member and I will be
the convenor. It’s been 18 months since the resolution process is on and there
is still no solution. Our Chairman has apologised for the delay. We need one
more chance. The final decision ultimately lies with the NCLT. We have made a
presentation to the buyers. We are committed to delivering their houses. Over
600 buyers attended the meeting. Some homebuyers decided to boycott the meeting
to protest against the almost decade long delay in possession of their flats.
They even demanded that banks should be asked to suspend monthly EMIs for the
time being to provide some relief.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
BANKING SYSTEM FACES RS 70,000 CRORE LIQUIDITY DEFICIT
Muted government spending
and high election-related spending have created a liquidity deficit of Rs
70,000 crore in the banking system, stymieing the Reserve Bank of India's
record liquidity infusion via bond purchases and the innovative dollar-rupee
swap, blunting the recent rate cut and clogging the efficacy of policy
transmission. System liquidity seems to be slightly more in deficit that is
normal at this time of the year, said Saugata Bhattacharya, chief economist at
Axis Bank. The proximate reason seems to be relatively high government balances
with RBI, which might be due to lower spends. Other contributing factors might
be higher cash withdrawal, weaker foreign exchange inflows and higher CRR (cash
reserve ratio) balances of banks, he said. The deficit is at Rs 70,266 crore on
April 16 compared to Rs 31,396 crore on April 3, data from the Bloomberg India
Banking Liquidity gauge showed. During the same period, the system was running
in surplus cash in the range of Rs 33,400 and Rs 84,600 crore although New
Delhi’s currency swap programme (DeMon) increased cash in the banking system
around that period. Extended deficit liquidity could become detrimental to
smoother monetary policy transmission said Upasna Bhardwaj. One of the primary
reasons for tighter liquidity conditions in April has been the unexpected muted
spending by the government. The surplus cash balance with the government is now
at about Rs 47,333 crore as on April 16 compared to nil balance in the
corresponding period last year. GST collections towards the end of the week are
expected to have further increased the cash balance and worsened liquidity
deficit given the absence of aggressive spending, she said. The liquidity
deficit may cross Rs 1 lakh crore by the end of last week in April, experts
said. While RBI has injected Rs 2.98 lakh crore in liquidity into the banking
system in 2018-19, it also conducted a dollar swap auction for $5 billion or Rs
34,500 crore in March. Similar dollar auction will also be carried out on
Tuesday to infuse similar quantum. Factors like ongoing weekly high central and
state government bond auctions too added to the deficit problem, Niyogi said.
On an average the central bank has sold about Rs 20,000-30,000 crore state and
central government debt in the first two weeks in April.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NEW MANAGEMENT
COMMITTED TO ENSURE GOOD GOVERNANCE, SAYS RELIGARE ENTERPRISES
Religare
Enterprises Friday said the new management team is committed to ensure that good
governance and accountability are the hallmarks of the group as it dubbed
allegations made by its former chief Sunil Godhwani as an attempt to divert
attention from fraudulent transactions. Godhwani has alleged conspiracy of the
company's current management and erstwhile promoters Malvinder Singh and
Shivinder Singh against him. In a submission to the corporate affairs ministry,
he had also said that an investigation should be started into the management
change that happened in February 2018. Against this backdrop, the company said
allegations are being made by Godhwani to divert attention from the fraudulent
transactions carried out in a listed company and the perpetrators need to
brought to book. It also said that the new management team is committed to
ensure that going forward the ethos of good governance, ethics and
accountability become the hallmark of the Religare Group.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
REGULATORY SANDBOX SHOULD COVER BIG COS, TOO: FINTECH FIRMS
The Reserve Bank of
India's draft framework to enable regulatory sandbox (RS) for fintech
innovation has been well-received by a majority of fintech players, even as
some have suggested a few tweaks in order to make it even more comprehensive.
The draft was released for stakeholder comments on Thursday. Incidentally, an
RS is a controlled environment for commercial testing of new technology with
limited regulations and customer exposure. The RBI draft is based on recommendations
from an inter-regulatory committee headed by a former executive director of
RBI, Sudarshan Sen. Regulatory sandboxes have been used in most advanced
economies to test the commercial viability and regulatory scope of any new
technology. Even while this method has been used by some major banks in India
before, a major regulator testing it would be hugely beneficial for the growth
of entire fintech ecosystem, said Mandar Agashe. However, the regulators should
also have opened the sandbox for established companies as well and not just
start-ups since it would have widened the scope of innovations. A lot of
fintech companies would have benefited from the findings of operating in such a
controlled environment, he said. The draft released by RBI said it would look
for technology solutions which should highlight an existing gap in the
financial ecosystem and provide suitable solutions in avenues such as payments
interface, data analytics and blockchain. The application would be open only
for registered Indian start-ups with a minimum worth of 50 lakh. Fit and Proper
criteria for promoters and directors is a welcome move as it will prevent
unscrupulous operators from entering the RS and preserve the sanctity of the
initiative, said Anurag Jain.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
WILL INDIA CONTINUE GROWING OR BREAK THE LINE?
India is far better off
economically than it was five years ago. Fiscal management has been
outstanding, and it has been clocking the highest growth rate among large
economies. Major reforms such as goods and services tax (GST), Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code (IBC), and Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Rera) have been
enacted. Infrastructure, financial inclusion and social reform campaigns have
moved at a brisk pace. Doing business is easier, there is less corruption, more
innovation. As a result, the individual citizen is better off than she was five
years ago. Despite this progress, however, India fares poorly when compared to
its peers among the Brics (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa)
countries, never mind the developed OECD (Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development) group. It also languishes in the UN Human
Development Index (HDI). Therefore, India’s journey to progress and prosperity
is far from complete. At current growth rates of about 7%, it will take two
more decades for India to reach ‘high income’ or ‘high human development’
country status. Faster growth can come only with ‘deep reforms’ such as land
acquisition and labour regulations. Many commentators believe that India can
transform itself without transformational leadership — that no matter what
government comes, India will continue its march towards its manifest destiny.
History, however, teaches that leadership matters — every nation that has
transformed itself has needed a transformational leader for a considerable
period, whether Kamal Ataturk in Turkey in the 1920s-30s, Franklin D Roosevelt
in the US in the 1930s-40s, Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore from the 1960s to 1980s,
Deng Xiaoping in China from the 1970s to 1990s, and Helmut Kohl in Germany from
the 1980s to 1990s. All of these leaders had the charisma, vision, integrity,
pragmatism and execution skills to change the trajectory of their nations to
such a degree that their leadership is considered ‘transformational’. Among
India’s leadership, Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Narendra Modi exhibit
some of the qualities considered to be that of transformational leaders. In the
absence of transformational leadership, countries progress to a certain extent,
but then can either fall into the ‘middle income trap’ (e.g., Argentina,
Brazil), or plateaus out before it can reach its peak (e.g., Japan). India also
has a ‘window of opportunity’ to seize, as China slows down, with the latter’s
labour cost advantage diminishing and labourintensive industries seeking to
relocate. Countries such as Indonesia, Vietnam and Mexico are aware of such
opportunities. An example of India missing out on this because of lack of
reforms or policy is the garment industry, where Bangladesh is now far ahead of
us. India is at a crossroad It can either seize the opportunity to transform
itself into a developed country over the next decade or two. Or it can continue
with its ‘business as usual’ journey with its current growth rates. The
continuing concerns about jobless growth and farmer distress are unlikely to be
abated without ‘deep reforms’. Seizing the opportunity will require
transformational leadership.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MOST IPOS LISTED THIS
YEAR TRADING OVER THEIR ISSUE PRICE
Stock
market listings in the first four months of calendar year 2019 kicked off on a
positive note with shares of six out of seven main companies that went for
initial public offers (IPO) trading at a price higher than their listing prices
However, five of the ten SME IPOs listed during this period are trading below
their issue price as they failed to retain sufficient investor interest. The
first four months of 2019 witnessed a cumulative fundraising of around Rs
9,591.71 crore from the main IPOs as against a whopping Rs 18,435.66 crore
raised during the corresponding period of 2018. A K Prabhakar, said there has
been an improvement in the overall IPO sentiment, but promoters must bring
something to table to attract investors to create demand. More often promoters
alone want to make money. If they offer some discounts to investors that would
help investors to make money as well, Prabhakar said. Metropolis Healthcare and
Polycab India debuted on the stock exchanges this week at a premium to their
issue prices. While Metropolis listed on the exchange at a premium of 9%,
Polycab debuted at a premium of over 21%. Apart from MSTC, which listed on the
exchange at a discount of 10.78% and is currently trading at 17.73% lower than
its issue price, all other stocks such as Xelpmoc Design and Tech, Chalet
Hotels, Embassy Office Parks REIT, Rail Vikas Nigam, Metropolis and Polycab are
trading between 9.5% and 38% higher than their issue price. On the other hand,
there is a decline in the number of IPOs in the SME segment compared to the
same period last year. Till March 2019, around 17 SMEs tapped the market to
raise a cumulative Rs 250.59 crore compared to 52 such companies, which raised
a cumulative Rs 917.42 crore during the same period last year, as per data
available with Prime Database. According to data available with a financial
news portal, five out of ten recent SME IPOs are trading below their issue
price. Prabhakar said takers for SME issues are limited as there are a lot of
restrictions. Retail participation is limited because unlike in main IPO,
purchases are to be made in huge lots. The regulations are made to attract high
networth individuals. Besides, chances of bankruptcy are also high in case of
these companies, hence investors are cautious with these stocks, Prabhakar
said, adding that only 40% of SME stocks can be expected to offer good returns.
Kejriwal said there had been mis-marketing in SME IPOs in the past. There was
an era for SME when anything and everything got sold. But investors have now
become cautious, and so are the merchant bankers. Thus the going has become
very tough for SMEs.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
SIPS IN EQUITY MFS LOG
10.26% ANNUAL RETURNS IN FIVE YEARS, BEAT GOLD, FDS
Investors
investing money in equity mutual funds through systematic investment plans
(SIPs) have earned an average return of 10.26% in the last five years since the
Narendra Modi-led NDA government came to power. In the last five years, the
benchmark Nifty returned 11.58% on a compounded basis every year. The Nifty
Midcap index gained 16.28% and the Nifty Smallcap index rose 12.48% on a
compounded basis during this period. The best performing fund was Mirae
Emerging Bluechip, returning 17.77% on a compounded basis every year, while the
worst performer was Baroda Midcap, which returned 3.58% in this period. SIPs
have been the preferred mode of investment for retail investors with monthly
mobilisations through this route moving up from 1,206 crore a month in March
2014 to 8,055 crore in March 2019. Almost 90% of the Nifty returns during the
last one year came from six stocks – Reliance Industries, HDFC Bank, Infosys,
TCS, ICICI Bank and Axis Bank. With equity schemes having investment
restrictions in every stock, the skewed performance has also hurt the returns
of equity schemes.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NON-LIFE INSURERS
WITNESS 13% RISE IN PREMIUM
Non-life
insurance firms registered a rise of 13 per cent in their collective premium
income to Rs 1.70 lakh crore in the financial year ended March, according to
data from Irdai. The 34 non-life insurers had a gross premium of Rs 1.51 lakh
crore in 2017-18. Among these insurers, as many as 25 are categorised as
general insurers, seven as standalone private sector insurers while the rest of
the two are government-owned specialised insurers. For the 25 general insurers,
the collective gross premium in 2018-19 stood at Rs 1.50 lakh crore, up by
nearly 13 per cent from Rs 1.33 lakh crore a year ago, showed the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) data. While the
standalone private health insurers witnessed a rise of 37 per cent in their
combined premium to Rs 11,368.82 crore in the financial year ended March 2019,
against Rs 8,314.27 crore a year ago. However, the state-owned specialised
insurers -- Agricultural Insurance Company of India and ECGC Ltd -- registered
a drop of 7.75 per cent in premium at Rs 8,425.75 crore during the fiscal ended
March 2019, as against Rs 9,133.78 crore in the previous financial year.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
CCI APPROVES DHFL’S 50%
STAKE-SALE IN PRAMERICA MF
The
Competition Commission of India has given its nod for the transaction involving
US-based Prudential Financial buying out DHFL’s 50 per cent shareholding in
their joint venture DHFL Pramerica Mutual Fund. It may be recalled that
crisis-ridden DHFL had late last year announced its exit from DHFL Pramerica
Mutual Fund through sale of its 50 per cent shareholding each in both DHFL
Pramerica Asset Managers and DHFL Pramerica Trustees to PGLH of Delaware Inc,
an entity owned by Prudential Financial. With the assent of the competition
watchdog, US-based Prudential Financial will gain sole control over DHFL
Pramerica Mutual Fund.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FOREX KITTY CONTINUES
TO SWELL, ADDS ANOTHER USD 1.1 BILLION
India's
foreign exchange reserves continued its northward push, increasing by USD 1.105
billion to touch USD 414.886 billion in the week to April 12, the Reserve Bank
data showed on Friday. Gold reserves also increased by USD 77.4 million to USD
23.303 billion, according to the data. The special drawing rights with the
International Monetary Fund was up by USD 3.3 million to USD 1.458 billion. The
country's reserve position with the Fund also increased by USD 378.1 million to
USD 3.362 billion, the apex bank said.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
INDIA GOVT HAD NO
OUTSTANDING LOANS FROM RBI IN WEEK TO APRIL 12
India's
government had no outstanding loans with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under
ways and means advances in the week ended April 12, according to the central
bank's weekly statistical supplement released on Friday. The central government
had no outstanding loans in the week earlier as well. The state governments had
Rs 6,032 crore ($869.34 million) loans from the RBI in the week ended April 12,
compared with Rs 7,382 crore in the previous week, the release showed.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
GOLD IMPORTS DIP 3% TO
$32.8 BN IN 2018-19, WILL KEEP A LID ON CAD
The
country's gold imports dipped about 3 per cent in value terms to $ 32.8 billion
during 2018-19, which is expected to keep a lid on the current account deficit.
Total imports of the precious metal in 2017-18 had stood at $ 33.7 billion,
according to data from the commerce ministry. Trade experts said softening
prices of the yellow metal in the global markets could be the reason for the
contraction in the value of imports. After recording negative growth in
February, the imports grew 31.22 per cent to $ 3.27 per cent in March. The
outbound shipments dipped only marginally by 0.37 per cent to $ 3.42 billion in
March. The government had introduced several measures to restrict the import of
gold. Import of the yellow metal attracts 10 per cent duty.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FINOLEX FAMILY DISPUTE
ESCALATES AMID SEVERAL COUNTER-ALLEGATIONS
The
family dispute at the Rs 15,000-crore Finolex Group has taken a new twist as
cousins Prakash Chhabria and Deepak Chhabria have accused each other in
separate exchange filings, of scheming to gain control of Finolex Cables Ltd
(FCL). Prakash is the biggest shareholder of Orbit Electricals, the promoter
entity of Finolex Cables, while Deepak is the latter company’s executive
chairman. Prakash Chhabria controls about 78 per cent of Orbit Electricals
while Deepak Chhabria owns a 8 per cent stake. Finolex Cables alleged in a
March 26 letter that Prakash Chhabria had submitted fraudulent documents to the
board of Orbit Electricals in a bid to gain control of the company. On behalf
of Prakash Chhabria, Orbit Electricals denied all allegations in a stock
exchange filing on Wednesday. The gift deed related to the stake of the late
Prahlad Chhabria passing on to his son Prakash Chhabria was not valid due to
mismatched signatures, non-registration of the document and inadequate stamp
duty, Finolex Cables had alleged. The letter also said the relevant minutes of the
Orbit Electricals board meeting had been concocted and the transfer of shares
to Prakash Chhabria was illegal, since there wasn’t a quorum. A case related to
the matter is currently being heard in the Bombay High Court. FCL has not acted
independently and certainly not in the interest of its stakeholders especially
the public. Prakash Chhabria had filed an appeal in the Bombay High Court last
year against the continuance of Deepak Chhabria.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HOUSING SALES UP 5%
DURING JAN-MAR IN 9 MAJOR CITIES: PROPEQUITY
Housing
sales saw a 5 per cent rise at 56,146 units during January-March 2019 over the
year-ago quarter in the nine major cities, driven by improved demand for
finished projects, according to data analytics firm PropEquity. New launches,
however, declined 7 per cent to 42,504 units in the first quarter of 2019 as
against the year-ago period in these nine cities -- Gurugram, Noida, Mumbai,
Kolkata, Pune, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Thane and Chennai. Indian real Estate
market is currently an end-user driven market as ready-to-move-in or nearing
completion properties are being preferred as they have minimum or no risk
attached to them, PropEquity said in its report. Unsold inventories dipped to 5.91
lakh units from 6.16 lakh units at the end of December 2018 on higher sales and
drop in new supply. As per the data, Pune saw maximum rise in sales at 32 per
cent at 14,996 units during January-March 2019 against the corresponding period
of the previous year. Housing sales in Bengaluru were up 5 per cent at 10,271
units, while Chennai witnessed 24 per cent rise in demand at 4,108 units. Sales
in Mumbai went up by 12 per cent at 5,619 units and by 3 per cent in Thane
(near Mumbai) at 11,404 units. Noida in Uttar Pradesh posed 19 per cent jump in
sales at 1,097 units. However, Gurugram (Haryana) and Hyderabad clocked 29 per
cent fall in sales at 2,918 and 3,216 flats, respectively. Kolkata, too, saw a
dip of 22 per cent at 2,517 units. Housing demand is expected to rise from this
quarter on the back of lower GST. In this year's interim budget, tax incentives
were announced for purchase of second property.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY
COMPLAINS TO FINANCE MINISTRY ABOUT NBFCS, INDIABULLS
The
real estate industry has written to the finance ministry, complaining about
NBFCs arbitrarily increasing interest rates on real estate projects. Real
estate body Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India
(Credai) has written to finance minister Arun Jaitley seeking issuance of
guidelines to non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) for timely completion of
real estate projects. The real estate developers have said some NBFCs are arbitrarily
and unilaterally increasing rate of interest charged on real estate projects. Highlighting
the specific case of Indiabulls, in a letter dated April 8, Credai has alleged
that Indiabulls being one of the largest lenders in the sector is causing undue
hardship for developers and creating a situation of financial strangulation. Credai
said in the last eight months, Indiabulls has increased the interest rate by
4.5-6% for all developers. Since RBI has been lowering benchmark rates, it is
clear that the interest rate has been increased by Indiabulls arbitrarily and
illegally, it said. On the other hand, Credai said: To add to the misery of the
developers and homebuyers, Indiabulls has also increased the escrow percentages
from 30% to 100% for many developers. Such an increase in escrow percentages is
totally illegal and against the norms of Rera which require 70% of the
collections to be used towards construction and land cost only. With 100% of
the collections going to Indiabulls through the escrow account, no money is
available with the developers for construction of the project, Credai said in
the letter. The industry body also said disbursements are not being made by
Indiabulls to carry out construction of the project. Indiabulls being in a
dominant position as a lender is abusing its position and creating a situation
of financially strangulating the projects, Credai said. The spokesperson added
that Indiabulls Housing Finance is still disbursing and did a total of
11,000-crore disbursal in the last eight months. Also, escrow mechanism with
our borrowers remains absolutely the same as before, developers are free to
prepay or refinance if they find interest rates high and we are waiving the
entire prepayment fees for such cases. Quite a few developers have also chosen
to prepay and we have accepted the repayments without prepayment fees, though
it was a part of the agreement, the Indiabulls spokesperson said. Credai has
urged the FM Arun Jaitley to have necessary guidelines issued to NBFCs that the
interest rates on ongoing projects may not be revised upwards for as long as
RBI does not raise the benchmark rates. It has also said the escrow amount
being withheld by the lender must be well within the norms stipulated by Rera
to ensure timely delivery to homebuyers and disbursements to ongoing real
estate projects may not be stopped for next two years.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RECRUITERS COLD TO
DIFFERENTLY-ABLED, ONLY 15% HIRE FROM THIS SET: STUDY
The
survey finds that the bulk of recruiters, or about 85 per cent of the
respondents, have either not hired or are companies in which such a concept is
still in pipeline. Effectively, only roughly 15 per cent of the respondents
actually have specially-abled employees on their rolls. This is despite that
fact that close to 40 per cent of India Inc believes in hiring
differently-abled for exploiting untapped skills, while another 30 per cent
does so to meet corporate social responsibility (CSR) obligations. According to
Genius Consultants, roughly 2.13 per cent of India's population is differently-
or specially-abled based on World Bank's definition of eight per cent
disability in the form of loss of locomotor skills, vision, hearing, speech and
mental faculties. The survey was conducted across companies, psychologists and specially-abled
job seekers and employees across sectors such as auto, BFSI, construction and
engineering, education, FMCG, hospitality, retail, telecom, and logistics,
among others. Further, 57.24 per cent of recruiters said that they were not yet
ready to invest in infrastructural changes or processes before employing
differently-abled people. When asked if hiring differently-abled was important
to them or not, 78.8 per cent recruiters responded positively, while 21.20 per
cent said that it was not important and led to losses in productive work hours
and employable workforce. What's more, majority of recruiters, at 61.74 per
cent, agreed that the biggest challenge in employing people with special
abilities was the attitude of co-workers Though Indian corporates are working
towards finding the most effective way of utilising differently-abled people,
but still 44.06 per cent are yet to explore the untapped pool of manpower. Almost
one third or 27.58 per cent of corporate think that they are helping differently
abled people to integrate normally into society whereas only 21.39 per cent do
so for an integrated workplace, creating a sense of equality among employees. Also,
61.74 per cent of corporate think that due to biased attitude among co-workers,
there has been less number of specially abled employees in the corporate
sector. However, 57.24 per cent of recruiters are ready to invest in making
work places specially abled friendly. As per specially abled employees, 54.16
per cent admit that there are only 10 or more such people hired at their
workplaces, though 95.83 per cent want to continue with their current employer.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
87% INDIANS WANT SEXUAL
HARASSMENT PREVENTION TO BE AN IMPORTANT FACTOR FOR HIRING
A
whopping 87 per cent of professionals in India say that harassment prevention
at the workplace is a very important trend for the future of hiring and HR
compared to 71 per cent globally, a new LinkedIn report said on Thursday. In
India, 50 per cent of hiring professionals said that companies now talk about
their harassment policies as part of their pitch to potential hires -- nearly
double the global average of 29 per cent. Anti-harassment is an especially
hot-button issue in India, said the LinkedIn Global Talent Trends 2019 report
that surveyed over 5,000 talent professionals in 35 countries, including more
than 400 professionals in India. While 75 per cent of those surveyed globally
noticed some change in workplace dynamics/culture over the last two years, 92
per cent in India said that their company has implemented some harassment
prevention action or tactic in the last 12 months or is planning to -- which is
higher than the global average of 80 per cent. There has been an over 71 per
cent (year-on-year) increase in workplace harassment content shared on
LinkedIn. Employees are starting to feel more empowered to stand up against
harassment - not just by calling for change, but by changing their own
workplace behaviour, said the Microsoft-owned professional networking platform.
Work flexibility was another important factor in considering a new job. About
67 per cent of talent professionals in India agree that workplace flexibility
-- the option for employees to work when and where they'd like -- is extremely
important in shaping the future of recruiting and talent, the findings showed.
Globally, in just the last two years, there's been a 78 per cent increase in
job posts on LinkedIn that mention work flexibility. In the space of only four
years, there's been a 24 per cent increase in the number of people who say
flexible work arrangements are a very important factor when considering a new
job. With technology easing the way we work, 74 per cent respondents in India
believe that the main benefit from allowing employees to work remotely, is
enabling them to achieve better work-life satisfaction. In the opinion of 66
per cent respondents, flexible work hours encourage employee retention. Women
are 22 per cent more likely than men to cite flexible work arrangements as a
very important factor when considering a job, with those aged 36 to 45 being
the most likely to do so, the report said. In India, 87 per cent respondents
believe that candidates with strong soft skills will be increasingly important
to the success of their organizations, however, only 53 per cent say their
companies have a formal process for assessing soft skills. Nearly 71 per cent
respondents in India agree that the top benefit of sharing salary ranges is
fostering greater job satisfaction for employees. That said, 78 per cent also
fear that this will create salary disputes among current employees, the report
noted.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HOW MUKESH AMBANI’S BET
ON THE INDIAN MIDDLE CLASS IS PAYING OFF
Billionaire
Mukesh Ambani’s debt-fueled bet on the rise of the Indian consumer is starting
to pay off with his retail and telecommunications businesses contributing an
increasing share of revenue and profit to his $87 billion empire. The two
divisions accounted for a combined 23 percent of revenue for the year ended
March, up from 17% in the previous year, according to data. That growth has
come at the expense of the conglomerate’s energy-related arms, which have been
the bedrock of Ambani’s business for more than a decade. Their revenue share
dropped to 77% from 83%, the data show. Asia’s richest man has ambitions to
take on Amazon.com Inc. and Walmart Inc. in India, where the power of the
middle class is growing along with demand for e-commerce. Ambani launched the
telecommunications business in 2016, spending $36 billion to roll out a 4G
wireless network across India and luring millions of subscribers with free or
cut-price data services. He’s now building on that business to create an online
shopping platform, just as the US giants come up against constraints on foreign
e-commerce activity in India. Mukesh Ambani has set big expectations for
Reliance’s consumer divisions, saying they will contribute almost as much to
the conglomerate’s earnings as energy-related arms by the end of 2028. The push
into e-commerce shows how the billionaire is trying to put his mark on an
empire that he largely inherited. Reliance Industries’ net debt climbing to ₹1.93 trillion in the year ended March,
or about 2.3 times ebitda, according to data. That compares with the 2.69 times
average for companies on the S&P BSE Sensex index as of Dec. 31. Mukesh
Ambani, 62, has been acquiring or purchasing stakes in businesses from Radisys
Corp. to Vakt Holdings Ltd. in a series of deals worth $2.5 billion over the
past two years. Reliance, Amazon and Walmart’s Bangalore-based Flipkart Online
Services Pvt. are seeking to carve up an online shopping market that Morgan
Stanley estimates will grow to $200 billion by 2028, from about $30 billion
last year.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ALIBABA HEAD’S REMARKS
SPARK DEBATE OVER CHINA WORKING HOURS
Remarks
by the head of Chinese online business giant Alibaba that young people should
work 12-hour days, six days a week if they want financial success have prompted
a public debate over work-life balance in the country. Mandatory overtime
reflects managerial arrogance and was also impractical and unfair to workers.
Online complaints included blaming long work hours for a lower birth rate in
the country.
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
R VENKATARAMANAN QUITS RATAN TATA'S INVESTMENT ARM RNT
ASSOCIATES
R Venkataramanan, the
former managing trustee of Tata Trusts, has resigned from RNT Associates
Private Limited, the personal investment vehicle of Tata group patriarch Ratan
Tata. According to a Ministry of Corporate Affairs filing, Venkataramanan quit
the firm as director on March 29. Since 2014, RNT Associates, along with UC-RNT
Fund, has been investing in a series of new-age companies in India and
overseas. It was also one of the early investors in companies like cab
aggregator Ola and online retailer Snapdeal. A Tata group insider said Venkat,
as Venkataramanan is popularly known, was instrumental in making some marquee
investments in Indian start-ups on behalf of RNT Associates, and used to
personally vet all proposals sent to Tata for investment in his personal
capacity. UC-RNT Fund, an alternative
investment fund with a corpus of $300 million, in partnership with RNT
Associates and the University of California, has invested in several
disruptive, technology-oriented businesses across the world. It takes a
long-term, founder-centric approach to investing. To date, the fund has made
investments in companies like NestAway, YourStory, CureFit, and MSwipe
Technologies. However, since June last year, it has not made any new
investment. According to media reports, Venkat has not been attending the
fund’s meeting since March last year.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
TIK-ING THE WRONG BOXES: APPS TO FACE MORE SCRUTINY
Social media, content and
gaming apps are grappling for a way to deal with heightened regulatory scrutiny
as Indian courts step in to stem the flood of socalled objectionable content on
these platforms, in one of the world’s fastest-growing internet markets.
Companies such as Facebook, Google-owned YouTube as well as Chinese apps such
as TikTok and Bigo Live will face even more regulatory scrutiny in future,
according to people in the know. As India debates the contours of a proposed
data law and awaits clarity on amendments to intermediary guidelines for
technology platforms, those concerned about the potentially harmful effects of
certain content on these apps are turning to the courts for redressal. The
courts are filling a vacuum and that’s a good thing, said a senior official at
the ministry of electronics and IT. The official expects there will be a vacuum
until new laws are finalised. Section 79 of the Indian Information Technology
Act, 2000 exempts intermediaries from liability for obscene and illegal
content, as long as they do not play any part in creation of content. The
proposed amendment have stricter timelines on takedown of harmful content once
notified by the government.The proposed data protection law drafted by Justice
BN Srikrishna Committee has prohibited technology companies from profiling,
tracking, behavioural monitoring or advertising directed at children. The draft
also proposed parental consent to sign up for apps.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FACEBOOK SAYS MORE
INSTAGRAM PASSWORDS EXPOSED THAN THOUGHT
Millions
more Instagram users were affected by a password security lapse than parent
company Facebook acknowledged nearly four weeks ago. The social media giant
said in late March that it had inadvertently stored passwords in plain text
making it possible for its thousands of employees to search them. It said the
passwords were stored on internal company servers, where no outsiders could
access them. Facebook said in a blog post Thursday that it now estimates that
millions of Instagram users were affected by the lapse, instead of the tens of
thousands it had originally reported. It had also said in March that the issue
affected hundreds of millions of Facebook Lite users and millions of Facebook
users. Facebook Lite is designed for people with older phones or slow internet
connections.
#For Source of Information copy and paste the heading in google.
Thanks & Regards,
CS Meetesh Shiroya
Thanks & Regards,
CS Meetesh Shiroya
Hey...Great information thanks for sharing such a valuable information
ReplyDeleteIndiabulls Consumer Finance NCD
Indiabulls NCD
Indiabulls Consumer NCD
Hey...Great information thanks for sharing such a valuable information. you may also check our blog.
ReplyDeleteCambridge Technology Enterprises Limited
Live hoting extremely proud of the thousands of success stories that have emerged in India from people using the BIGO LIVE APP platform. Many of our hosts have made it big and become an Internet sensation, with huge follower base, full-time career opportunity and huge monthly earnings.
ReplyDelete